Jockey® No Panty Line Promise® Long John
$32.00 $9.99
Sale items are not eligible for 2-Day Shipping using ShopRunner
product details
  • lightweight women's long john is beautifully soft
  • touch of stretch provides a body-hugging fit for a feminine look
  • smooth edges along your ankles and waistline create an invisible look when layering underneath your favorite outfits
  • fashionable colors and prints of the season
  • women's thermal pant extends to the ankle for full coverage and warmth
  • Jockey® women's thermal long johns come with a 100% satisfaction guarantee!
Fabric Content: 93% modal / 7% spandex. Machine wash and dry. Imported
FREE Shipping at $75
FREE Returns on every order
4.1 / 5.0
20 Reviews
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
Perfect blend of soft and cozy
Love these to wear under sweat pants whilie walking and hiking in cold weather. I also wear them under riding breeches in cold weather. They are so comfy, I wear them around the house. I am 5'7" and 155lbs and I bought a medium and they are just the right length and fit. I usually wear an 8 or 10 in pants. Definitely recommended.
January 30, 2013
Sizing not accurate
I like the material because, unlike other long johns, these stretch easily and are comfortable under jeans. But, the mediums, which are appropriately long, are too big in the waist for the sizing.
January 7, 2013
Love my Modal Long Johns!!
I've been looking for PJ pants for quite some time that were soft and comfy. All I could find were pants that ride up to my knees in the night. I sewed elastic to a pair, but they were still short, and the elastic then rose up my legs. at 5'6" I was frustrated not to easily find comfortable PJ pants. LOVE THESE so much in black, I bought the grape color, and am now eyeing the white. The only thing I dont love, is that I wish the inseam were sewed down both sides and not just one. it could be softer there if they sewed it that way. But I am so pleased I dont have to struggle any long with PJs hiking up in the night.
February 16, 2013
So soft!!
Love these to wear as leggings under dresses but they're thin enough to wear under pants too. I just came back to order more but my size is out of stock. :(
March 3, 2013
better than last year's model
The fabric feels smooth and silky. The ankle elastic is much improved over last year's "rubber band" like elastic, and the waist elastic doesn't roll and twist like last year's but it is very thin and flimsy, so I don't know how it will hold up after several washings. Great colors.
January 30, 2013
very comfortable
I bought these to wear under my clothes in the winter months. I needed something non-bulky and lightweight, but warm. These fit the bill!
March 9, 2013
waistband better last year
The waistband they switched to this year is rough and a bit binding. I liked the waistband on this same style that I ordered from them last year or the year before where the band was wide and much softer.
January 30, 2013
Loose and disappointed in color
I was not 100% satisfied with these thermal leggings. I really like how silky and lightweight they are and the length of the medium sized long johns worked well for my 5'6" frame. I was not satisfied with the 'burnt taupe' color. It looks more flesh-colored than anything and makes your legs look like a different skin tone. This would work well if you are wearing pants over these long johns but does not work for wearing skirts. They were also a bit baggy around the bag of the knee but fit nicely around the ankle and waist.
June 3, 2013
Sizing runs large
I love the fabric; soft and comfortable, not bulky like most other "long johns".
I ordered a Medium, based on the fit of other Jockey stretchy pants and these are much larger than expected. I would exchange them for a Small or even an X-Small, but I purchased them on sale and between shipping costs back and out again, not worth the expense.
Order a smaller size, if you purchase this item. You won't be disappointed in the fabric.
July 25, 2013
Beautifully soft-and long enough!!
Excellent product! I ordered some thermal pants last year, and there was often a gap between where the pants ended and my socks/shoes began. Not here! They're almost a little too long, but I love the coverage! :D Beautifully soft and warm, lightweight, not over-warm...perfect.
January 1, 2013
Start typing your question and we'll check if it was already asked and answered. Learn More
Browse 1 question Browse 1 question and 1 answer
Why did you choose this? Store
Like the no line look. Less bulky under other clothes.
Barbara B on Nov 9, 2013
Like the no line look. Less bulky under other clothes.
Barbara B on Nov 9, 2013
pairs perfectly with: