Jockey® Naturals Seamfree® Boyshort
$10.50 $4.99
product details
This boyleg provides a body-contouring and seamless silhouette. The popular fit offers full front and back coverage and a low-rise that sits approx. 4" below your waist. You'll enjoy the super, comfy thick waistband and Jockey logo at the right hip. The fabric blend is also breathable and allows moisture to absorb and evaporate; plus, this ultra-light style drifts over your skin and glides easily under clothing. Plus, lightly ribbed outer gusset and heat seal label.
  • our simple and practical panty provides continuous comfort
  • this boyshort sits approximately 4" below the waist providing a full coverage fit
  • Seamfree ® underwear features a soft, breathable fabric blend to help absorb moisture
  • Jockey® naturals boyshort drifts over your skin and glides easily under clothing
Have Questions?
FREE shipping at $59
No-hassle returns & exchanges
3.2 / 5.0
193 Reviews
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
I Love This Panty
I just purchased this last week and must say I will buy many more! The size ran a little big, but the fit is luxurious. The wide waistband feels great and does not roll over. I only wish it came in more colors.
October 5, 2009
Not Happy
I was excited about these because I loved my skimmes. I was very disappointed as soon as I walked they went to the dark side of the moon. Bought three pair would not recommend unless your happy to play with your undergarments all day.
August 28, 2012
Wouldn't buy again.
At first these felt comfy, but then as I walked around, the leg part rolls up and creep up. I was constantly trying to adjust them. The "leg" part needs to be longer so they don't ride/roll up.
September 2, 2013
so soft
I love this style but I can no longer find it in stores
October 3, 2013
Wide waist band doesn't bind. Low rise fits my anatomy.I have worn jockey as long as I can remember. It continues to improve- this is the best for me in fit, comfort, and wear.
October 11, 2013
Not as described.
Fits fine. Do not like the fabric. Boy cut should have longer legs to them these are like wearing regular womens panties. My legs still rub together without slacks on. The idea of the extra leg is to not have that happen.
June 4, 2012
Are these suppose to be Thongs???
These undies were so unbearable to wear because of the constant climbing up my rear! It was so bad that I almost went to the restroom while out shopping to remove them and throw them in the garbage! I had purchased a pair of Boyleg briefs about a year ago from Jockey and they were outstanding, but for some unknown reason you decided to discontinue the product.... you made a mistake!!! Very disappointed with this product.
August 16, 2011
I bought three pairs thinking that I would like them because of the style and the fabric. Was a waste of money. The ride up and stretch out. I would not recommend them.
August 20, 2009
Great for supermodels, not for me
I was thrilled with the fabric's feel and source, but the problem is the crotch panel is too narrow so the bottom of the leg rides up and then, voila, perma-wedgie. I am a size 5, but went up to an 8 in hopes of more derriere coverage and not so much riding. Instead, the waist travelled around and the riding just got worse. Completely bummed.
September 18, 2009
If you have no butt, these are great!
The panties are lovely and look great, but the rear end has no room - and I have a VERY flat butt, so if someone has a bit more junk in THEIR trunk, I can't imagine how they could even get them on. The waist does fit well, but if I wanted a 'thong', I would have gotten one. I threw every one of these away...
October 5, 2009
Start typing your question and we'll check if it was already asked and answered. Learn More
No questions have been asked about this item. Be the first!