Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

...

Service and delivery comments:

I am extremely satisfied with purchase / delivery.

I love Jockey.

I wish you had the cotton tank tops that are loose fitting (you did at one time) and the long sleeve T's that are of the same quality as the items I just purchased.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

I wear mediums. I'm 5'10 168lbs & have 39" chest.

The first run Trim Fits(2006) were awesome. They didn't shrink much. The next 3pack(2008) shrunk too much after tumble low, tight & way short. 2009's 3 packs I don't dry & lay flat. Perfect. They dry fast, they're thin. * Jockey, we need trim fit High V necks!!!!

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

trying to buy jockey undershirts has been a guessing game since several years ago and very frustrating. they clearly changed their sizing, probably to accomodate the fact that so many americans are obese. the "regular" (my word) undershirt that was reliable forever, is now too wide for us men who aren't fatties. you also have to be a mindreader to guess what the marketing on the package means. "modern fit" is completely non-descriptive, yet apparently is a polite way of saying "this is catered to today's fat man." there also seem to be quality control issues because i bought two packs of the regular fit that have totally different lenghths after like two washes.
so i still am looking and recently became optimistic finding the "trim fit" which i believe i read is "online only" but upon receiving that order, it is too long. i will return it, and give the outlet store another visit but i am not optimistic.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

I don't like the new loose fit, but this trim fit would be perfect if it came in a tall.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

They don't shrink, and the collars don't stretch
like so many other brands.
I will check to see if they also come in
colors.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

Perfect for under work shirts. Fits close to body so not unflattering bubble around your belly at the end of the day.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

Trim fit out of the package was right on, but after 2 washes, they are way too short. 42 chest, 6'2" tall and they are now too short. I would suggest a size up from "normal" t-shirts. I will order again, but could have saved myself some $$.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

These trim fit t-shirts are great in every aspect except length. I am 6'2" 180 lbs and I like to wear close fitting undershirts that are not baggy and have a high, crisp collar. I got the size large when I usually wear a medium. The fit was good all around except for the length. I dislike very much when my t-shirts come untucked out of my jeans but unfortunately that's waht kept happening. If I get the XL then it might be longer but not snug fitting around my body. I wear undershirts everyday with a collard, button up shirt and on the weekends just a t-shirt to lounge around in or work around the house or car. Shirts that constantly become untucked don't cut it for me. Had to return and ask for refund. I even got an extra set for my Dad as he is a longtime Jockey wearer but he is taller than me by 2" so I knew they wouldn't work.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

This is a great t shirt. I had given up on Jockey t s because they changed the fit - especially the neck. I don't have a 20" neck and I wanted a snug crew fit. Went to 2xist brand for awhile but now they've changed theirs too. Then I found the trim fit classic and I'm back. This works under dress shirts and polos. They're long enough to stay tucked in.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

very disappointed with the design / quality of this product. there's no reason that the bottom seam should get so crazy after one washing.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

I would have to disagree with most of these reviews. Measured myself just to be sure I wasn't crazy. I have a 39" chest a 32" waist and am 45.5" around the shoulders, I'm only 5'9" 155lbs so I'm not a big guy. Pre-wash these shirts were soft, thin, and very tight around my shoulders and lats/arm pits length was a concern as well. Tag says wash warm, dry medium, I washed cold and dried low. The result was a shirt that I could only wear comfortably if I quit working out, and stopped eating. Still too thin, not as soft, too short and too tight in the upper torso. I expected a tighter mid section not an overall smaller shirt. Not impressed with the quality of the shirt, maybe QA issues are responsible for conflicting reviews. Good idea - poor execution

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

Love wearing this T! Fits just right and hate to take it off. Its also supper soft!

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

Great style. Fits perfectly under my muscle fit polos not to long at the sleeves or the waist. Just waiting for you guys to sell it in black.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

I've got these in medium and large...I'm 6'2" and about 165. I got the mediums first and love the cut, but purchased some larges as I prefer the slightly greater length when wearing these as a work undershirt (better for tucking in). I use the medium as an undershirt for more casual, un-tucked going out and they are great. As a reference, I typically wear mediums in short sizes (15/35 in dress shirts). So, if you're getting these as work undershirts, I'd recommend going up a size for the added length if you're a tall/thin type.

Comments about Jockey Tag-free Trim Fit T-shirt – 3 pack:

I was excited to find an "athletic" fit in undershirts. Most Jockey undershirts are too big for me around the waist. These shirts fit GREAT -- except that they are too short for my 5'8" frame. Out of the package, they fit well, but after one wash, they shrink so much that they don't stay tucked into suit pants. (SIGH).